No Time to Die production thread

11971982002022031208

Comments

  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    Is this Madeline? *sssssluurp"
  • Posts: 14,800
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Is this Madeline? *sssssluurp"

    Well, maybe not like this.

    Maybe this belong to the questions section, but didn't the early draft of SP mentioned that Blofeld had been a cannibal in the past?
  • edited August 2019 Posts: 19,339
    Ludovico wrote: »
    JamesCraig wrote: »
    Is this Madeline? *sssssluurp"

    Well, maybe not like this.

    Maybe this belong to the questions section, but didn't the early draft of SP mentioned that Blofeld had been a cannibal in the past?

    I have heard that that as well,i believe it did,yep.
  • Posts: 5,767
    barryt007 wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    You are undoubtedly right. Why go after Malek at the height of his career and give him a subsidiary role?

    To tell a good story, and get the actor you want to tell that story.

    I don't fully understand the concept of "More Money = More Screentime". The point of film is to tell a story, and all resources should be used to that end.

    You’re correct and I think I said somewhere that this is not necessarily about screentime, but, instead, the story will hinge on Malek’s character. He is, I’m assuming, the Big Baddie and is the “Inciting Incident”, the catalyst of the story.

    I was merely saying that I’d be surprised if Blofeld was the lead villain, and not Malek’s character (especially because of where Malek is in his career, and how expensive he is; also it’d be strange for him to accept a second fiddle bag guy role).

    Precisely.

    The impression a villain leaves is the true test. You don’t need a huge amount of screentime. In fact, Javier Bardem arrives into SF around 70-80 minutes into the film and has a maximum of 20 mins screentime. But he makes each moment count and steals the show.

    Dr No turns up in the film named after him around 90 mins in with only 20 mins of film left.

    Bond villains are glorified supporting characters. But….if done well, they can linger in the memory and really hold our attention and capture our imagination.

    Malek is having a huge moment in his career currently and getting him as the villain is a huge win for Eon and Fukunaga. If it wasn’t for Fukunaga’s involvement, I don’t think they’d have got him.

    But his casting makes worlds of sense. When I first heard his name, I was struck with how genius the suggestion was. I was almost angry I didn’t think it up, as he’s perfect for the role.

    He's back in NYC filming Mr Robot currently
    , looking more like Bond than the villain

    I wonder how much screen time he gets then,if he has time to do this...maybe 50/50 with Waltz.

    Incorrect.

    Waltz is cameoing in the film. His role will be comparable to Mr White in Spectre.

    Bond and Madeleine need to meet with Blofeld as he holds a vital clue. waltz has one significant scene which will be reminiscent of Hannibal Lector in Silence of the Lambs and Alice Morgan in the second series of Luther. I.e ; he's in prison taunting the heroes for coming to him with their tales between their legs for intel.

    anigif_original-grid-image-4888-1427503641-18.gif?crop=524:347;50,0

    I think Blofeld's escape will be saved for a later film - where we will get a new Bond and perhaps a new Blofeld.

    Rami is the lead villain.
    And why do you claim @barryt007 ´s assumption is incorrect and yours correct?

  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    boldfinger wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    You are undoubtedly right. Why go after Malek at the height of his career and give him a subsidiary role?

    To tell a good story, and get the actor you want to tell that story.

    I don't fully understand the concept of "More Money = More Screentime". The point of film is to tell a story, and all resources should be used to that end.

    You’re correct and I think I said somewhere that this is not necessarily about screentime, but, instead, the story will hinge on Malek’s character. He is, I’m assuming, the Big Baddie and is the “Inciting Incident”, the catalyst of the story.

    I was merely saying that I’d be surprised if Blofeld was the lead villain, and not Malek’s character (especially because of where Malek is in his career, and how expensive he is; also it’d be strange for him to accept a second fiddle bag guy role).

    Precisely.

    The impression a villain leaves is the true test. You don’t need a huge amount of screentime. In fact, Javier Bardem arrives into SF around 70-80 minutes into the film and has a maximum of 20 mins screentime. But he makes each moment count and steals the show.

    Dr No turns up in the film named after him around 90 mins in with only 20 mins of film left.

    Bond villains are glorified supporting characters. But….if done well, they can linger in the memory and really hold our attention and capture our imagination.

    Malek is having a huge moment in his career currently and getting him as the villain is a huge win for Eon and Fukunaga. If it wasn’t for Fukunaga’s involvement, I don’t think they’d have got him.

    But his casting makes worlds of sense. When I first heard his name, I was struck with how genius the suggestion was. I was almost angry I didn’t think it up, as he’s perfect for the role.

    He's back in NYC filming Mr Robot currently
    , looking more like Bond than the villain

    I wonder how much screen time he gets then,if he has time to do this...maybe 50/50 with Waltz.

    Incorrect.

    Waltz is cameoing in the film. His role will be comparable to Mr White in Spectre.

    Bond and Madeleine need to meet with Blofeld as he holds a vital clue. waltz has one significant scene which will be reminiscent of Hannibal Lector in Silence of the Lambs and Alice Morgan in the second series of Luther. I.e ; he's in prison taunting the heroes for coming to him with their tales between their legs for intel.

    anigif_original-grid-image-4888-1427503641-18.gif?crop=524:347;50,0

    I think Blofeld's escape will be saved for a later film - where we will get a new Bond and perhaps a new Blofeld.

    Rami is the lead villain.
    And why do you claim @barryt007 ´s assumption is incorrect and yours correct?

    It's what he does for a living. [-( \m/
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    edited August 2019 Posts: 1,003
    boldfinger wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    You are undoubtedly right. Why go after Malek at the height of his career and give him a subsidiary role?

    To tell a good story, and get the actor you want to tell that story.

    I don't fully understand the concept of "More Money = More Screentime". The point of film is to tell a story, and all resources should be used to that end.

    You’re correct and I think I said somewhere that this is not necessarily about screentime, but, instead, the story will hinge on Malek’s character. He is, I’m assuming, the Big Baddie and is the “Inciting Incident”, the catalyst of the story.

    I was merely saying that I’d be surprised if Blofeld was the lead villain, and not Malek’s character (especially because of where Malek is in his career, and how expensive he is; also it’d be strange for him to accept a second fiddle bag guy role).

    Precisely.

    The impression a villain leaves is the true test. You don’t need a huge amount of screentime. In fact, Javier Bardem arrives into SF around 70-80 minutes into the film and has a maximum of 20 mins screentime. But he makes each moment count and steals the show.

    Dr No turns up in the film named after him around 90 mins in with only 20 mins of film left.

    Bond villains are glorified supporting characters. But….if done well, they can linger in the memory and really hold our attention and capture our imagination.

    Malek is having a huge moment in his career currently and getting him as the villain is a huge win for Eon and Fukunaga. If it wasn’t for Fukunaga’s involvement, I don’t think they’d have got him.

    But his casting makes worlds of sense. When I first heard his name, I was struck with how genius the suggestion was. I was almost angry I didn’t think it up, as he’s perfect for the role.

    He's back in NYC filming Mr Robot currently
    , looking more like Bond than the villain

    I wonder how much screen time he gets then,if he has time to do this...maybe 50/50 with Waltz.

    Incorrect.

    Waltz is cameoing in the film. His role will be comparable to Mr White in Spectre.

    Bond and Madeleine need to meet with Blofeld as he holds a vital clue. waltz has one significant scene which will be reminiscent of Hannibal Lector in Silence of the Lambs and Alice Morgan in the second series of Luther. I.e ; he's in prison taunting the heroes for coming to him with their tales between their legs for intel.

    anigif_original-grid-image-4888-1427503641-18.gif?crop=524:347;50,0

    I think Blofeld's escape will be saved for a later film - where we will get a new Bond and perhaps a new Blofeld.

    Rami is the lead villain.
    And why do you claim @barryt007 ´s assumption is incorrect and yours correct?

    Exactly. No one knows anything. Just guessing.


    Maybe I’m crazy but I don’t see Rami as an A list actor...

    He was a minor terrorist in 2 episodes of 24. Iv never seen the robot show he’s in, I know it’s gotten good reviews but it’s not like it’s the hottest show out there.

    Not saying he’s a bad actor but I just don’t get the A list status.

    More like an upcoming future star like Florence Pugh!

    She’s had one huge movie like rami, some quality tv shows and now the lead in black widow. She’s also replacing black widow in the avengers and is definitely the next J-Law but not quite the A list status yet.
  • Posts: 19,339
    boldfinger wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    You are undoubtedly right. Why go after Malek at the height of his career and give him a subsidiary role?

    To tell a good story, and get the actor you want to tell that story.

    I don't fully understand the concept of "More Money = More Screentime". The point of film is to tell a story, and all resources should be used to that end.

    You’re correct and I think I said somewhere that this is not necessarily about screentime, but, instead, the story will hinge on Malek’s character. He is, I’m assuming, the Big Baddie and is the “Inciting Incident”, the catalyst of the story.

    I was merely saying that I’d be surprised if Blofeld was the lead villain, and not Malek’s character (especially because of where Malek is in his career, and how expensive he is; also it’d be strange for him to accept a second fiddle bag guy role).

    Precisely.

    The impression a villain leaves is the true test. You don’t need a huge amount of screentime. In fact, Javier Bardem arrives into SF around 70-80 minutes into the film and has a maximum of 20 mins screentime. But he makes each moment count and steals the show.

    Dr No turns up in the film named after him around 90 mins in with only 20 mins of film left.

    Bond villains are glorified supporting characters. But….if done well, they can linger in the memory and really hold our attention and capture our imagination.

    Malek is having a huge moment in his career currently and getting him as the villain is a huge win for Eon and Fukunaga. If it wasn’t for Fukunaga’s involvement, I don’t think they’d have got him.

    But his casting makes worlds of sense. When I first heard his name, I was struck with how genius the suggestion was. I was almost angry I didn’t think it up, as he’s perfect for the role.

    He's back in NYC filming Mr Robot currently
    , looking more like Bond than the villain

    I wonder how much screen time he gets then,if he has time to do this...maybe 50/50 with Waltz.

    Incorrect.

    Waltz is cameoing in the film. His role will be comparable to Mr White in Spectre.

    Bond and Madeleine need to meet with Blofeld as he holds a vital clue. waltz has one significant scene which will be reminiscent of Hannibal Lector in Silence of the Lambs and Alice Morgan in the second series of Luther. I.e ; he's in prison taunting the heroes for coming to him with their tales between their legs for intel.

    anigif_original-grid-image-4888-1427503641-18.gif?crop=524:347;50,0

    I think Blofeld's escape will be saved for a later film - where we will get a new Bond and perhaps a new Blofeld.

    Rami is the lead villain.
    And why do you claim @barryt007 ´s assumption is incorrect and yours correct?

    Exactly. No one knows anything. Just guessing.


    Maybe I’m crazy but I don’t see Rami as an A list actor...

    He was a minor terrorist in 2 episodes of 24. Iv never seen the robot show he’s in, I know it’s gotten good reviews but it’s not like it’s the hottest show out there.

    Not saying he’s a bad actor but I just don’t get the A list status.

    More like an upcoming future star.

    I'm not sure he would have got the part if it wasn't for the fact he is riding high in the popularity stakes after Bohemian Rhapsody.
  • JamesCraigJamesCraig Ancient Rome
    Posts: 3,497
    barryt007 wrote: »
    boldfinger wrote: »
    barryt007 wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    echo wrote: »
    You are undoubtedly right. Why go after Malek at the height of his career and give him a subsidiary role?

    To tell a good story, and get the actor you want to tell that story.

    I don't fully understand the concept of "More Money = More Screentime". The point of film is to tell a story, and all resources should be used to that end.

    You’re correct and I think I said somewhere that this is not necessarily about screentime, but, instead, the story will hinge on Malek’s character. He is, I’m assuming, the Big Baddie and is the “Inciting Incident”, the catalyst of the story.

    I was merely saying that I’d be surprised if Blofeld was the lead villain, and not Malek’s character (especially because of where Malek is in his career, and how expensive he is; also it’d be strange for him to accept a second fiddle bag guy role).

    Precisely.

    The impression a villain leaves is the true test. You don’t need a huge amount of screentime. In fact, Javier Bardem arrives into SF around 70-80 minutes into the film and has a maximum of 20 mins screentime. But he makes each moment count and steals the show.

    Dr No turns up in the film named after him around 90 mins in with only 20 mins of film left.

    Bond villains are glorified supporting characters. But….if done well, they can linger in the memory and really hold our attention and capture our imagination.

    Malek is having a huge moment in his career currently and getting him as the villain is a huge win for Eon and Fukunaga. If it wasn’t for Fukunaga’s involvement, I don’t think they’d have got him.

    But his casting makes worlds of sense. When I first heard his name, I was struck with how genius the suggestion was. I was almost angry I didn’t think it up, as he’s perfect for the role.

    He's back in NYC filming Mr Robot currently
    , looking more like Bond than the villain

    I wonder how much screen time he gets then,if he has time to do this...maybe 50/50 with Waltz.

    Incorrect.

    Waltz is cameoing in the film. His role will be comparable to Mr White in Spectre.

    Bond and Madeleine need to meet with Blofeld as he holds a vital clue. waltz has one significant scene which will be reminiscent of Hannibal Lector in Silence of the Lambs and Alice Morgan in the second series of Luther. I.e ; he's in prison taunting the heroes for coming to him with their tales between their legs for intel.

    anigif_original-grid-image-4888-1427503641-18.gif?crop=524:347;50,0

    I think Blofeld's escape will be saved for a later film - where we will get a new Bond and perhaps a new Blofeld.

    Rami is the lead villain.
    And why do you claim @barryt007 ´s assumption is incorrect and yours correct?

    Exactly. No one knows anything. Just guessing.


    Maybe I’m crazy but I don’t see Rami as an A list actor...

    He was a minor terrorist in 2 episodes of 24. Iv never seen the robot show he’s in, I know it’s gotten good reviews but it’s not like it’s the hottest show out there.

    Not saying he’s a bad actor but I just don’t get the A list status.

    More like an upcoming future star.

    I'm not sure he would have got the part if it wasn't for the fact he is riding high in the popularity stakes after Bohemian Rhapsody.

    He was brilliant as Freddie. The rest of the movie was bit of a letdown.
  • SuperintendentSuperintendent A separate pool. For sharks, no less.
    Posts: 870
    I don't hate the movie, I am a big fan of Queen, but I just didn't see him as Freddie.
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 5,921
    Denbigh wrote: »
    It's all about getting your moneys worth, it is a business at the end of the day.

    But thats what I mean, why does getting your moneys worth equate to screen time? Getting your moneys worth to me means box office return, and that depends on whether the film is good; the audience isn't clocking how many minutes Rami Malek appears in a film.

    EDIT: But your point is taken, I get it, the man's expensive so they want to use him as much as they can. I just don't agree with the concept.

    But Malek is.
  • Posts: 4,400
    Vogue: Dua Lipa recording the latest Bond theme?



    Neither particularly thrilled or devastated by this news. she's about 1000 times more appropriate for the job than Ed Sheeran. She also fits the "young, British and popular" criteria. She's also v hot:

    dua-lipa-01.jpg?w=700&h=437&crop=1

    But I can't help but help that Eon could do a lot better..... I'm also unsure how good a voice she has.



  • Bentley007Bentley007 Manitoba, Canada
    Posts: 564
    Vogue: Dua Lipa recording the latest Bond theme?



    Neither particularly thrilled or devastated by this news. she's about 1000 times more appropriate for the job than Ed Sheeran. She also fits the "young, British and popular" criteria. She's also v hot:

    dua-lipa-01.jpg?w=700&h=437&crop=1

    But I can't help but help that Eon could do a lot better..... I'm also unsure how good a voice she has.




    Would Vogue post this in an article if there wasnt some truth behind it?
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,834
    I mean the article still says it's a rumour so I'd still take this with a pinch of salt.

    Guys, Jorja Smith should be the one. I'm telling you!
  • Bentley007 wrote: »
    Vogue: Dua Lipa recording the latest Bond theme?



    Neither particularly thrilled or devastated by this news. she's about 1000 times more appropriate for the job than Ed Sheeran. She also fits the "young, British and popular" criteria. She's also v hot:

    dua-lipa-01.jpg?w=700&h=437&crop=1

    But I can't help but help that Eon could do a lot better..... I'm also unsure how good a voice she has.




    Would Vogue post this in an article if there wasnt some truth behind it?

    The Dua Lipa rumour does go back awhile, wasn't she filming/due to film a video in Italy?
  • matt_umatt_u better known as Mr. Roark
    edited August 2019 Posts: 4,343
    The "hit or miss" Sassilive reported the news about Dua Lipa being the singer 5 months ago.

    3 days ago they reported that Sheeran took the job instead.

    Lol if she's indeed the singer would be ridiculous for them. But I don't think she will be.
    Bentley007 wrote: »
    Vogue: Dua Lipa recording the latest Bond theme?



    Neither particularly thrilled or devastated by this news. she's about 1000 times more appropriate for the job than Ed Sheeran. She also fits the "young, British and popular" criteria. She's also v hot:

    dua-lipa-01.jpg?w=700&h=437&crop=1

    But I can't help but help that Eon could do a lot better..... I'm also unsure how good a voice she has.




    Would Vogue post this in an article if there wasnt some truth behind it?

    The Dua Lipa rumour does go back awhile, wasn't she filming/due to film a video in Italy?

    That filming rumor came from Sassilive... just saying...

    Still waiting B25 to be called THE MATER SPY... :D
  • WalecsWalecs On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    edited August 2019 Posts: 3,157
    Bentley007 wrote: »
    Vogue: Dua Lipa recording the latest Bond theme?



    Neither particularly thrilled or devastated by this news. she's about 1000 times more appropriate for the job than Ed Sheeran. She also fits the "young, British and popular" criteria. She's also v hot:

    dua-lipa-01.jpg?w=700&h=437&crop=1

    But I can't help but help that Eon could do a lot better..... I'm also unsure how good a voice she has.




    Would Vogue post this in an article if there wasnt some truth behind it?

    The Dua Lipa rumour does go back awhile, wasn't she filming/due to film a video in Italy?

    It was around long before Fukunaga got the gig

    https://www.nme.com/news/film/dua-lipa-record-next-james-bond-theme-2315166

    Smith was rumored almost a year before the film's release, as for Adele's Skyfall I remember her being rumored before the first teaser trailer came out (possibly even before that)
  • Posts: 220
    Delay for the casting scheduled today in Italy (around 900 extras) at Matera. It has been cancelled and currently no location or new dates for this one are available.

    https://imoviezmagazine.it/annullato-il-casting-comparse-per-james-bond-25/
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 7,969
    Lio007 wrote: »
    Delay for the casting scheduled today in Italy (around 900 extras) at Matera. It has been cancelled and currently no location or new dates for this one are available.

    https://imoviezmagazine.it/annullato-il-casting-comparse-per-james-bond-25/

    Wow.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited August 2019 Posts: 5,834
    Lio007 wrote: »
    Delay for the casting scheduled today in Italy (around 900 extras) at Matera. It has been cancelled and currently no location or new dates for this one are available.

    https://imoviezmagazine.it/annullato-il-casting-comparse-per-james-bond-25/
    Hmmm I'd be for inclined to believe this if it came from a better source.

    Plus it was posted over a month ago and we haven't heard anything else about this.
  • Posts: 157
    Minion wrote: »

    So this is where Blofeld was being kept while imprisoned?
  • Posts: 4,400
    Bentley007 wrote: »
    Vogue: Dua Lipa recording the latest Bond theme?



    Neither particularly thrilled or devastated by this news. she's about 1000 times more appropriate for the job than Ed Sheeran. She also fits the "young, British and popular" criteria. She's also v hot:

    dua-lipa-01.jpg?w=700&h=437&crop=1

    But I can't help but help that Eon could do a lot better..... I'm also unsure how good a voice she has.




    Would Vogue post this in an article if there wasnt some truth behind it?

    I don't believe Vogue would report on this if there wasn't something from Dua Lipa's camp to indicate that she is a contender for the title song. It isn't the type of publication to speculate........

    I do believe that Dua Lipa has been contacted and ask to think of something. Though I reckon a handful of artists have as well. Much like how both Sam Smith and Radiohead were asked.

    We would get a music video at least....

    large.jpg

    60651531_155691375480067_2706317585752583447_n.jpg?mtime=20190605094308
  • Posts: 11,425
    Minion wrote: »

    Nice tidbit. I love the secrecy around this film. At the very least it's gonna be full of twists and turns. A proper Bond yarn for the first time in years. Looking forward to it.
  • edited August 2019 Posts: 11,425
    I tjink these days (and probably for years) they do get two artists to play off against each other. Sheeran's new album is garbage. Adele would be preferable.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited August 2019 Posts: 14,861
    Rossi wrote: »
    Minion wrote: »

    So this is where Blofeld was being kept while imprisoned?

    The Palmerston Sea Forts do make a good Bondy location for a Naval prison, it's true.

    image.jpg


    This article certainly thought so! :)
    https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/special-features-2-19441/the-remarkable-history-of-the-james-bond-solent-forts-1-8724652

    Funnily enough, the Master (Dr Who's arch enemy) was imprisoned in one in a 1970s Dr Who story :)
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    Dua Lipa CAN sing. WAAY better than Ed!!



  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    Posts: 3,000
    Dua Lipa CAN sing. WAAY better than Ed!!

    Give me a can of beans and my rear can sing better than Ed.
  • Posts: 12,506
    mtm wrote: »
    Rossi wrote: »
    Minion wrote: »

    So this is where Blofeld was being kept while imprisoned?

    The Palmerston Sea Forts do make a good Bondy location for a Naval prison, it's true.

    image.jpg


    This article certainly thought so! :)
    https://www.portsmouth.co.uk/special-features-2-19441/the-remarkable-history-of-the-james-bond-solent-forts-1-8724652

    Funnily enough, the Master (Dr Who's arch enemy) was imprisoned in one in a 1970s Dr Who story :)

    That idea works for me and you know they would lets say use some creative licence on it!
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,548
    Dua Lipa CAN sing. WAAY better than Ed!!




    If it is going to be a female singer, I'd prefer Sia.
  • edited August 2019 Posts: 5,767
    Dua Lipa CAN sing. WAAY better than Ed!!



    Can you provide some Clips where she does?
Sign In or Register to comment.