Blade Runner 2049: October 2017

DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
edited October 2016 in General Movies & TV Posts: 13,672
I love Blade Runner. Second favourite film of all time. But do I have confidence in BR2? I'm not sure. With Prometheus, Scott gave me a film I liked but was still somewhat disappointed with as it wasn't a true Alien movie. Luckily, the script for BR2 seems to be in the hands of Hampton Fancher, who is 77 by the way. Scott himself is currently 76. And Ford is 73. Then there's Dave Bautista. I wonder if they bring in Sean Young. :D Or Vangelis, also 73.
«13456715

Comments

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Vampire State Building
    Posts: 21,446
    I will be there no matter what. I will have to be dead to stay away.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
    Posts: 13,672
    Oh same here, @Thunderfinger. And even when dead, I'm sure they can fix me to a Nexus body.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Vampire State Building
    Posts: 21,446
    Yes, good point. No Matter What, then.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
    Posts: 13,672
    I'm interested but I have doubts that it can succeed.

    1) Blade Runner is still, despite its cult following and assumed popularity, a little-known film.

    2) Hard sci-fi with an existential touch is relatively unpopular. I can, however, only imagine that BR2 will cost a lot (effects and such) so they might want to appeal to a wide audience.

    3) The "you haven't seen this before!" effect probably won't work any more in this day and age because there's a very good chance we have seen it before.

    4) Either BR2 stays close to BR, which may not bring in the big crowds, or it doesn't stay close to BR, which will upset me.
  • Posts: 10,497
    The 2 films I'm most excited about for coming years: 'Blade Runner 2' and 'Indiana Jones 5'. The reason? Harrison Friggen Ford.
  • edited April 2016 Posts: 4,016
    As I thought Indiana Jones 4 was a bad idea, I don't like the idea of Blade Runner 2 or Indiana Jones 5. Do I know they'll be bad movies? Of course not, but I'm not confident about the idea at all. Sequels for the sake of sequels (i.e. money) bugs me usually. If they can make great stories and entertaining movies out of them, then I'll gladly eat my words.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Vampire State Building
    Posts: 21,446
    Make it in glorious 3D.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
    Posts: 13,672
    They're doing a Trainspotting 2 as well! How is that possible?
  • Posts: 10,497
    I'm going to see Trainspotting 2 on opening day just to witness Robert Carlyle cursing at everyone for 2 hours.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
    Posts: 13,672
    Trainspotting is an amazing film but again, why a sequel? What wasn't said with the first one that they're going to say now?
  • Posts: 10,497
    @DarthDimi I believe because the author of the original novel wrote a sequel, so they probably thought 'let's adapt that one too'. ;)
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Vampire State Building
    Posts: 21,446
    The only sequels I truly hate are the sequels to the old Disney classics.
  • Posts: 10,497
    The only sequels I truly hate are the sequels to the old Disney classics.

    And the 4 sequels to 'LTK'? ;)

  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Vampire State Building
    Posts: 21,446
    The only sequels I truly hate are the sequels to the old Disney classics.

    And the 4 sequels to 'LTK'? ;)

    Haha! When you mention it, yes.
  • edited April 2016 Posts: 4,016
    The only sequels I truly hate are the sequels to the old Disney classics.

    Ugh they are so horrible. Especially since I had to buy them to get many of the classics on Blu-Ray! (They come bundled often). The only Disney sequel I really liked was The Rescuers Down Under. I don't count the 2011 Winnie the Pooh, which I also enjoyed.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Vampire State Building
    Posts: 21,446
    FoxRox wrote: »
    The only sequels I truly hate are the sequels to the old Disney classics.

    Ugh they are so horrible. Especially since I had to buy them to get many of the classics on Blu-Ray! (They come bundled often). The only Disney sequel I really liked was The Rescuers Down Under. I don't count the 2011 Winnie the Pooh, which I also enjoyed.

    The first sequel to Aladdin wasn t too bad.
  • Posts: 4,016
    FoxRox wrote: »
    The only sequels I truly hate are the sequels to the old Disney classics.

    Ugh they are so horrible. Especially since I had to buy them to get many of the classics on Blu-Ray! (They come bundled often). The only Disney sequel I really liked was The Rescuers Down Under. I don't count the 2011 Winnie the Pooh, which I also enjoyed.

    The first sequel to Aladdin wasn t too bad.

    Compared to the rest it's tolerable. Still, no Robin Williams made it sad. I actually prefer King of Thieves. Hunchback 2 was the absolute worst for me; first was so good.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 14,305
    If Vangelis doesn't do the music I'll pass.
    If Sean Young isn't in it I'll pass.
    If they don't get the tone right I'll pass.
    If Ford dies in it I'll pass.

    Basically, if they don't make me a consultant on the film, I'll pass.
    :))
  • There should be a law that no sequel must be made of a movie that is older than 10 years. Noncompliance will be punished by having to watch Crystal Skull one week straight.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
    Posts: 13,672
    Looks to me, @chrisisall that you want to make the film. Give me the part of Gaff and you have my support.
  • chrisisallchrisisall Brosnan Defender Of The Realm
    Posts: 14,305
    DarthDimi wrote: »
    Looks to me, @chrisisall that you want to make the film. Give me the part of Gaff and you have my support.
    :))

    Seriously, I don't see any way this film won't end up just making me sad.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
    Posts: 13,672
    I would say, "let's have faith in Scott", but I won't.
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.
    Posts: 26,178
    I have faith in it. The cast and crew are shaping up wonderfully, I think having anyone else behind it would have me worried and interest free.
  • Posts: 4,016
    There should be a law that no sequel must be made of a movie that is older than 10 years. Noncompliance will be punished by having to watch Crystal Skull one week straight.

    Cruel and unusual punishment...
  • BirdlesonBirdleson San Jose, CA
    Posts: 18,355
    I liked BLADE RUNNER too much to have any interest in a damned sequel.
  • Posts: 4,016
    Birdleson wrote: »
    I liked BLADE RUNNER too much to have any interest in a damned sequel.

    I knew @Birdleson would share my opinion on this one. The first ended so perfectly too...
  • BirdlesonBirdleson San Jose, CA
    Posts: 18,355
    Yes.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
    Posts: 13,672
    The first one ended in a way that makes me wonder how you can go from here.
  • But which ending do you talk about?
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!
    Posts: 13,672
    All of them, my friend. Let the ambiguity reign supreme. I can't for the life of me imagine where they'd take the story from here.
Sign In or Register to comment.