Bond Movie A vs. Bond Movie B (Dr. No vs. SkyFall)
  • QBranchQBranch
    Posts: 2,410
    @0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 You can't beat 60's spy thrillers. Top notch stuff! Let's hope some of the feel comes back, as we know it can be done properly. :)
  • BennyBenny
    Posts: 1,614
    A seemingingly tough choice. But DN wins by the simple fact it's the better film.
  • RogueThunderballRogueThunderball
    Posts: 298
    Dr. No. It's just simply better.
  • W_PPKW_PPK
    Posts: 170
    Dr. NO
  • 0iker00iker0
    Posts: 396
    Dr. NO. just because the story's better, Goldfinger is overrated and it had Maurice Binder
  • Agent005Agent005
    Posts: 528
    Edit: Deleted Post
  • dragonskydragonsky
    Posts: 778
    Hm....This is really hard..

    I guess

    GF
  • doubleoegodoubleoego
    Posts: 2,991
    Dr.No easily.

    Bond at his most authoritative.

    The introduction of the name.

    Jamaica

    Jack Lord

    Honey

    Dr.No himself/dinner table scene

    Killing of Dent

    Connery Connery Connery!!!
  • chuck007chuck007
    Posts: 162
    Dr.NO
  • Dr_MetzDr_Metz
    Posts: 395
    doubleoego said:

    Connery Connery Connery!!!

    Connery was in Goldfinger as well.

  • SJK91SJK91
    Posts: 950
    Two simply stunning films. It's quite close, but I'll give it to Goldfinger....though if Dr. No wins this match (which it looks like it will), I will not be upset at all! :D

    2. Goldfinger (1964) - 10/10
    3. From Russia With Love (1963) - 9.5/10
    4. Dr. No (1962) - 9/10
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7
    Posts: 13,619
    Dr_Metz said:

    doubleoego said:

    Connery Connery Connery!!!

    Connery was in Goldfinger as well.



    I'm sure @doubleogo liked DN more to begin with, and Connery's appearance was just another point on the board for it considering all the other things he listed about DN. He can speak for himself though, that's just my opinion.
  • Agent007391Agent007391
    Posts: 3,537
    Dr. No It may just use the Bond theme as it's opening title credits song, but at least it's better than that crappy Goldfinger. Plus, the plot's better. Plus, the villain's better. Plus, the Bond Girl's hotter and better. Plus the supporting cast is better.

    I guess I'll just say that EVERY G**DAMN THING is better than Goldfinger.
  • 00Beast00Beast
    Posts: 4,046
    Dr. No

    First off let me say that neither are anywhere close to my favorites. Still, in a match-up between the two, Dr. No wins. Big factors here include a better Bond girl, a better main villain, better performance by Sean Connery, a more dark-edged and brutal Bond, and for a BIG point, it's not Goldfinger!
  • doubleoegodoubleoego
    Posts: 2,991
    Dr_Metz said:

    doubleoego said:

    Connery Connery Connery!!!

    Connery was in Goldfinger as well.



    Connery's performance and the spy/detective work he had to do was better. He may not have been as smooth or as relaxed as he was in GF but the his performance overall imo was better in Dr.No.
  • connerybondconnerybond
    Posts: 123
    DN always as Sean Connery appeared as Bond as until then having read the novel Bond was in my mind, and in DN he was on the screen in front of me!
  • connerybondconnerybond
    Posts: 123
    FRWL for its plot and locations and again for its direction by Young! But for me DN is very special as I watched as soon as it was released.
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 4,767
    Both are great but I'd go for GF. Its just a bit more "polished". DN was a prototype for what was to come.
  • Baltimore_007Baltimore_007
    Posts: 4,555
    Doctor No - without question

    This is what maybe constitutes as an 'unfair battle'

    Connerys first is fun, lively, exotic, fast paced, intriguing, has Honey Ryder

    Connerys Third is dull, gray, slow, lifeless, has Honor Blackman

    Pretty simple math
  • QsAssistantQsAssistant
    Posts: 690
    This one is almost evil... making me pick between the two; almost like I have to pick which one is my favorite kid.

    Going to go with Goldfinger. I just feel it was the one to set up Bond in future movies and it made him popular; plus it was the first Bond film I saw.
  • dragonskydragonsky
    Posts: 778
    Baltimore_007 said:

    Doctor No - without question

    This is what maybe constitutes as an 'unfair battle'

    Connerys first is fun, lively, exotic, fast paced, intriguing, has Honey Ryder

    Connerys Third is dull, gray, slow, lifeless, has Honor Blackman

    Pretty simple math


    :O You don't like Honor Blackman? :O

  • WVPoefWVPoef
    Posts: 145
    Goldfinger.

    My list of rating.

    GF - 4.
    DN - 8.
  • Agent007391Agent007391
    Posts: 3,537
    dragonsky said:

    Baltimore_007 said:

    Doctor No - without question

    This is what maybe constitutes as an 'unfair battle'

    Connerys first is fun, lively, exotic, fast paced, intriguing, has Honey Ryder

    Connerys Third is dull, gray, slow, lifeless, has Honor Blackman

    Pretty simple math


    :O You don't like Honor Blackman? :O



    I don't either.
  • SaintMarkSaintMark
    Posts: 2,123
    Goldfinger
  • slyfoxslyfox
    Posts: 573
    Easily DN for me.
  • identigraphidentigraph
    Posts: 658
    Dr No for me!
  • 00Beast00Beast
    Posts: 4,046
    The results are in! Sorry for the delay, I've been busy with school, as usual.
    DN: 20 votes
    GF: 12 votes

    Connery's first triumphs over his second in a landslide!

    All right, the next match-up is:

    Live and Let Die vs. The Spy Who Loved Me
  • JBFan626JBFan626
    Posts: 1,332
    Spy

    LALD doesn't age well
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 4,767
    Spy
  • SaintMarkSaintMark
    Posts: 2,123
    The Spy Who Loved Me, the first time they really catered to Roger Moore's strenghts. And a rejuvenation of the franchise.
Add a Comment

Categories

In this Discussion