What direction would YOU have gone?
  • BAIN123BAIN123
    Posts: 4,806
    Getafix said:

    SaintMark said:

    Getafix said:

    SaintMark said:

    The MR effects still stand up today.



    Definitely. But I'm not saying EON or Bond effects are bad - just that there have been dodgy moments in the past. May be I am thinking of DAF. Which one is it where the villain's spcaeship 'eats' the US/USSR space pods? I think it was made around the same time as Kubrick's 2001 and yet the effects look like something from Button Moon.


    Special effects were something new then.



    When did 2001 come out though? Not long after YOLT I don't think.


    2001 came out a year after YOLT in '68 (I think).
  • BAIN123 said:

    Getafix said:

    SaintMark said:

    Getafix said:

    SaintMark said:

    The MR effects still stand up today.



    Definitely. But I'm not saying EON or Bond effects are bad - just that there have been dodgy moments in the past. May be I am thinking of DAF. Which one is it where the villain's spcaeship 'eats' the US/USSR space pods? I think it was made around the same time as Kubrick's 2001 and yet the effects look like something from Button Moon.


    Special effects were something new then.



    When did 2001 come out though? Not long after YOLT I don't think.


    2001 came out a year after YOLT in '68 (I think).


    Correct.
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 3,155
    BAIN123 said:

    Getafix said:

    SaintMark said:

    Getafix said:

    SaintMark said:

    The MR effects still stand up today.



    Definitely. But I'm not saying EON or Bond effects are bad - just that there have been dodgy moments in the past. May be I am thinking of DAF. Which one is it where the villain's spcaeship 'eats' the US/USSR space pods? I think it was made around the same time as Kubrick's 2001 and yet the effects look like something from Button Moon.


    Special effects were something new then.



    When did 2001 come out though? Not long after YOLT I don't think.


    2001 came out a year after YOLT in '68 (I think).


    There you go. Compare the SFX between those two and it's almost as embarassing as DUD's kite surfing sequence. Almost.
  • echoecho
    Posts: 1,185
    Getafix said:

    SaintMark said:

    Getafix said:

    SaintMark said:

    The MR effects still stand up today.



    Definitely. But I'm not saying EON or Bond effects are bad - just that there have been dodgy moments in the past. May be I am thinking of DAF. Which one is it where the villain's spcaeship 'eats' the US/USSR space pods? I think it was made around the same time as Kubrick's 2001 and yet the effects look like something from Button Moon.


    Special effects were something new then.



    When did 2001 come out though? Not long after YOLT I don't think.


    You are correct. 1968.