thelivingroyale said:
actonsteve said:But have any of the production staff ie writers, directors, cameramen,actors actually come out and say QoS is Bourne influenced? Or is it just conjecture? Or projection?
Why would they? They're not gonna come out and thank Bourne for inspiring it. I think it is a bit Bourne influenced, definetly on the action and editing side of things. I don't see as much Bond in it as I did in CR.
actonsteve said:i am not a fan of Bourne (I have never forgiven Matt Damon and Greengrass for slagging off James Bond for publicity after each one came out) and don't really get the citicism of QoS as Bourne influenced.
To me its its own film. Its original and has a good story and Bond. Or is it just shorthand describing something as Bourne influenced as "I really want to go back to the wisecracking and invisible cars?"
I like hard thrillers and like the fact that the Bonds can do good hard thrillers. And I like QoS.
I read one article about Damon slagging of Bond, which did piss me off a bit. Never heard Greengrass mention it. QOS has a good Bond. That's about it imo.
Or is it just shorthand describing something as Bourne influenced as "I really want to go back to the wisecracking and invisible cars?"
Y'know, there can be a middle ground between QOS and DAD. You can have humour without going OTT. Just because people don't like QOS it doesn't mean they want invisible cars and space battles. If I say "I hope SF has some gadgets and humour" I'm tired of getting responses like "Craig isn't going to have ninjas absailing down a volcanoe and he isn't going to drive an invisible car or do a campy shit Bond", because that's not what I want. I want a middle ground, like TLD, OHMSS, LTK, FRWL, TB, FYEO, etc.
Getafix said:
Paul Greengrass said:...[my] Jason Bourne movies offer a more lasting legacy than the James Bond franchise, because the audience identifies more closely with Matt Damon's action hero.
Creasy47 said:I've never cared for Matt Damon in the slightest.
bondbat007 said:Ha I quite liked Craig's response to the Bond vs Bourne vs Batman question
Getafix said:Funny, I read what Greengrass and Damon both said and thought actually, they're completely right. For me tho, the problem is that the Bond producers are now embarrassed by the legacy. In many ways Bond was already an anachronism in the 60s, and ever more so during the 70s and 80s, but he kept on doing what he'd always done and we loved him for it.
I think if the producers went back to the more unapologetically unreconstructed character, they'd find cinema going audiences much more forgiving of Bond's prejudices and peccadilloes than they imagine. People all around the world love the faint absurdity of a British spy still lording it over evil gangsters and criminals and saving the world - and having a jolly good time in the process. Bring back Mr. Kiss Kiss Bang Bang!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.