thelivingroyale said:Nightfire. They'd have to tone down the action, and move the finale from space to Drax's island base, but it could really work well.
Sir_Miles_Messervy said:They're videogames, they're meant to be OTT. EON is probably the only one that could be made into a movie without a drastic change to the plot. The pre-title sequence/the motor bike chasing the train and the finale are things that i could easily see being translated onto the big screen with little change to it.
Agent007391 said:
Sir_Miles_Messervy said:They're videogames, they're meant to be OTT. EON is probably the only one that could be made into a movie without a drastic change to the plot. The pre-title sequence/the motor bike chasing the train and the finale are things that i could easily see being translated onto the big screen with little change to it.
Not Blood Stone? Arguably the most realistic Bond game?
thelivingroyale said:
Agent007391 said:
Sir_Miles_Messervy said:They're videogames, they're meant to be OTT. EON is probably the only one that could be made into a movie without a drastic change to the plot. The pre-title sequence/the motor bike chasing the train and the finale are things that i could easily see being translated onto the big screen with little change to it.
Not Blood Stone? Arguably the most realistic Bond game?
Blood Stone is all over the place though. The story is forgettable, the ending is stupid, Pomerov is a weak villian (was he even the main villian?). I think they'd need to change it.
thelivingroyale said:Nightfire. They'd have to tone down the action, and move the finale from space to Drax's island base, but it could really work well.
thelivingroyale said:Nightfire. They'd have to tone down the action, and move the finale from space to Drax's island base, but it could really work well.
X3MSonicX said:Something i feel sad and i repeat constantly are the NF graphs. I don't understand why Nightfire Graphics on PC sux as the same time as the PS2 are the best ones. The game stills the same, the action is "worth its weight in Gold" like the Fort Knox description says, However i think they could have used some more time and patience to do the work in the PC version. As example, you can see the weapons difference between them. Poor fact.
00Beast said:
X3MSonicX said:Something i feel sad and i repeat constantly are the NF graphs. I don't understand why Nightfire Graphics on PC sux as the same time as the PS2 are the best ones. The game stills the same, the action is "worth its weight in Gold" like the Fort Knox description says, However i think they could have used some more time and patience to do the work in the PC version. As example, you can see the weapons difference between them. Poor fact.
I actually prefer the graphics on the GameCube over those on the Playstation 2. I just think that the GC version feels more polished and clean on the graphics, whereas the PS2 version reminds me that this is a 2002 game. I never get that feeling while playing the GC version; I feel like I might as well be playing a 2012 game! Also, and I know this is a bit nit-picky, but the PS2 version includes some strange white puff cloud thing whenever you shoot or punch a bot, almost like an early-stage hit marker or something. The GC version doesn't have this, and I'm glad because it annoys the dump out of me! Oh, and who can forget that fact that the GC version allows you to have 6 bots while the PS2 version only allows for 4!
X3MSonicX said:
00Beast said:
X3MSonicX said:Something i feel sad and i repeat constantly are the NF graphs. I don't understand why Nightfire Graphics on PC sux as the same time as the PS2 are the best ones. The game stills the same, the action is "worth its weight in Gold" like the Fort Knox description says, However i think they could have used some more time and patience to do the work in the PC version. As example, you can see the weapons difference between them. Poor fact.
I actually prefer the graphics on the GameCube over those on the Playstation 2. I just think that the GC version feels more polished and clean on the graphics, whereas the PS2 version reminds me that this is a 2002 game. I never get that feeling while playing the GC version; I feel like I might as well be playing a 2012 game! Also, and I know this is a bit nit-picky, but the PS2 version includes some strange white puff cloud thing whenever you shoot or punch a bot, almost like an early-stage hit marker or something. The GC version doesn't have this, and I'm glad because it annoys the dump out of me! Oh, and who can forget that fact that the GC version allows you to have 6 bots while the PS2 version only allows for 4!
6 bots?? Gosh, i need a Gamecube! *--*
Haha, i always find that 'puff cloud' thing strangely weird also... with that exception, for me the game stills very fun :)
00Beast said:
X3MSonicX said:
00Beast said:
X3MSonicX said:Something i feel sad and i repeat constantly are the NF graphs. I don't understand why Nightfire Graphics on PC sux as the same time as the PS2 are the best ones. The game stills the same, the action is "worth its weight in Gold" like the Fort Knox description says, However i think they could have used some more time and patience to do the work in the PC version. As example, you can see the weapons difference between them. Poor fact.
I actually prefer the graphics on the GameCube over those on the Playstation 2. I just think that the GC version feels more polished and clean on the graphics, whereas the PS2 version reminds me that this is a 2002 game. I never get that feeling while playing the GC version; I feel like I might as well be playing a 2012 game! Also, and I know this is a bit nit-picky, but the PS2 version includes some strange white puff cloud thing whenever you shoot or punch a bot, almost like an early-stage hit marker or something. The GC version doesn't have this, and I'm glad because it annoys the dump out of me! Oh, and who can forget that fact that the GC version allows you to have 6 bots while the PS2 version only allows for 4!
6 bots?? Gosh, i need a Gamecube! *--*
Haha, i always find that 'puff cloud' thing strangely weird also... with that exception, for me the game stills very fun :)
Oh of course, without a doubt! The game is always the best, no matter what version!
00Beast said:@X3MSonicX: Exactly, EoN is really fun at times, but can get old and dull after a short period of time. Also, they really cheated us on the multiplayer. You'd think that if Nightfire in 2002 could have such an incredibly amazing multiplayer that EoN in 2004, given the two-year advancements, would have gone the next step and really pulled out all the stops, but no. Instead, it stinks. Big time.
X3MSonicX said:
00Beast said:@X3MSonicX: Exactly, EoN is really fun at times, but can get old and dull after a short period of time. Also, they really cheated us on the multiplayer. You'd think that if Nightfire in 2002 could have such an incredibly amazing multiplayer that EoN in 2004, given the two-year advancements, would have gone the next step and really pulled out all the stops, but no. Instead, it stinks. Big time.
Indeed. I actually prefer Nightfire because you can play it alone and get bots to fight and train skills for SP. In EoN, i never had the chance to see what is the MP missions because a second player is required.
00Beast said:
X3MSonicX said:
00Beast said:@X3MSonicX: Exactly, EoN is really fun at times, but can get old and dull after a short period of time. Also, they really cheated us on the multiplayer. You'd think that if Nightfire in 2002 could have such an incredibly amazing multiplayer that EoN in 2004, given the two-year advancements, would have gone the next step and really pulled out all the stops, but no. Instead, it stinks. Big time.
Indeed. I actually prefer Nightfire because you can play it alone and get bots to fight and train skills for SP. In EoN, i never had the chance to see what is the MP missions because a second player is required.
It's not worth it, because in EoN, in order to have access to other maps and characters, you have to go through a cooperative multiplayer with a friend. My brother and I have done this before, and it's too complicated and not really that fun either. Plus, even when you do unlock the multiplayer conent, bots are not included, so it would just be one-on-one between you and a friend. It gets tiresome quickly!
00Beast said:@X3MSonicX: Oh yeah, that bomb defuse mission is rather irksome! My friend from church and I played through that one at his house, and because he is very short-tempered, that didn't go over too well, hahahaha. He was ready to break the PS2 any minute! To answer your question, I don't believe so, as far as I'm concerned, you get everyone else from the game except for 007 and Jaws, which is really strange. You even get Baron Samedi and Oddjob, who are not part of the game! I mean I'm fine with that, I always enjoy playing as the classic villains, but if they were going to include them, why not others also, like Nightfire did with 11 classic villains!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
