Dr_Metz said:
At least Lazenby didn't come out of water in tight trunks, and spout cheesy lines like "I have no armor left, You've stripped it from me". Also, Lazenby is the man, you don't know what you're talking about.DoubleOhhSeven said:He shouldn't be wooden and bark his lines like Lazenby I can tell you that much.
What an arrogant and pompous thing to say. Are they only smart because they share the same opinion as you? Also, what your idea of what a "smart" person is seems to be someone who basically climaxed to CR and Craig's performance.DoubleOhhSeven said:Much smarter people than you have agreed that Lazenby was passable at best but defiantly a lesser Bond.
So what? Someone likes James Bond a lot. It doesn't mean their opinion is the ultimate opinion. Also, not all "hardcore" fans love Craig. Actually, if someone actually did know how James Bond is and should be, they wouldn't have liked Casino Royale.DoubleOhhSeven said:Craig isn't just liked by the general audience but by hardcore fans too.
I actually just referenced a quote from CR that I thought was pretty awful, you're the one who hasn't named actual reasons Lazenby was bad other than the old "he was too wooden" line. Also, nice spelling. I see I'm conversing with a genius here.DoubleOhhSeven said:You can't even back up your arguement.
What did you expect me to say to what you said? You said "Well I guess everyone is dumb except you." What did you want me to say to that? "Sorry DoubleOhhSeven, you are better than me in every way"?DoubleOhhSeven said:You've basically said that both casual and hardcore fans that dismiss Lazenby aren't as smart as you, don't understand the character and are "uneducated" as you put it.
Compared to Connery and Dalton, yes, they were better. But Daniel Craig hasn't exactly wowed me with his performances. Also, OHMSS was Lazenby's first ever film, and I think he did pretty good, considering that.DoubleOhhSeven said:It's because his performance was simply nothing special and can't compare to the likes of Connery, Craig, or Dalton
Find a Lazenby fan who will say that.DoubleOhhSeven said:Even Lazenby fans will admit that the two are on a seperate level.
It wasn't just that, it was the corny lines, failed attempt to be "dark", and just the general vibe of the film. It looks and feels like a USA network series, akin to Burn Notice or something.DoubleOhhSeven said:As far as Craig's blue trunks go again it's a very mut point that Craig-haters seem to make.
It's a 50 year-old series. That's basically saying anyone who likes Connery, Lazenby, Moore, Dalton, or Brosnan is "living in the past".DoubleOhhSeven said:Stop living in the past.
Now that's just funny.DoubleOhhSeven said:Most people on this aren't childish and look for grammer mistakes.
I would have liked to have seen Lazenby go up to '75, let Moore do TSWLM in '77 and another one in '79, and then maybe have Lazenby return for FYEO and OP.timmer said:Too bad he couldn't have done more films. He would have got even better.
That's what I was considering as well. It's sad that the Bond film timelines we are making up are much better than the one we have in real life.Master_Dahark said:I'd even keep him for FYEO-- then let Dalton come on in
Dr_Metz said:
That's what I was considering as well. It's sad that the Bond film timelines we are making up are much better than the one we have in real life.Master_Dahark said:I'd even keep him for FYEO-- then let Dalton come on in
Which is sad but true. But there is probably someone out there who loves every Bond film and wouldn't want the timeline any other way.0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 said:The timelines we have in our minds will always be better than what we get.
I would choose Dalton as a Brosnan replacement. I don't care if he would have been 55 by 2002.timmer said:GE -DAD (someone other than Broz, but who else was in the running)
The series probably would have ended with AVTAK. The general public would never have accepted someone else in the role after that long a Connery tenure.timmer said:My perfect Bond timeline would be Sean for DN- AVTAK (14 films and then graceful retirment, but no Sean had to do aother things. Grrrr!)
timmer said:Lazenby IMO acted well enough to play Bond. He kept things simple. I tought he did a great job. He was very convincing as 007. Too bad he couldn't have done more films. He would have got even better.
And that's the depressing reality of the situation. We can imagine what a longer Lazenby era would have been like, but it will never exist.BAIN123 said:I agree but the fact is he didn't.
timmer said:Oh well, what's done is done. All of the films work as great Bondian entertainment, even the Broz films.
I wish DC the best. The more influence he can channel from Sean, the better!
Post Craig - let's hire another youngster in the Sean tradition. Audition a hundred young actors, if need be, till we find the one with both the right look and the right mix of menace and charm. Keep thinking Sean. Sean Sean Sean. Don't be tempted to lower the bar. Be disciplined people.
I don't mean to be rude, but if all the Bond actors ever tried to do was to try and be like Connery, none of them would have had any uniqueness to them.timmer said:Keep thinking Sean. Sean Sean Sean. Don't be tempted to lower the bar. Be disciplined people.
Dr_Metz said:
I don't mean to be rude, but if all the Bond actors ever tried to do was to try and be like Connery, none of them would have had any uniqueness to them.timmer said:Keep thinking Sean. Sean Sean Sean. Don't be tempted to lower the bar. Be disciplined people.
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.